Legal Opinion
People v. Noggle
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 1935No. Crim. 1430PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant was convicted under the provisions of section 74 of the California Vehicle Act of the misdemeanor of driving his automobile without a license therefor, after his permit to do so had been revoked by the department of motor vehicles without notice to him and without a hearing.
In August, 1929, the defendant was regularly granted an operator’s license to drive his automobile, which was numbered 634,428. He was employed by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company at Red Bluff. He lived in the country near by, and used his machine as a necessary incident to his business. For several years…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burgess v. Mayor of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Watson v. Division of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Martin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Laplante v. State Board of Public RoadsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Carroll v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Spurbeck v. StattonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- August v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.