Legal Opinion

Felice v. City of Inglewood

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1948No. Civ. 16147PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Appellant filed a petition with the city council of respondent city of Inglewood for a permit to engage in business as a used automobile dealer. After public hearings by the council, at which evidence was offered and received, the permit was denied. Appellant applied to the court for a writ of mandate to compel the granting of his petition. An alternative writ was issued in response to which respondent, by way of return thereto, filed a demurrer to appellant’s amended petition, accompanied by an “offer and submission by defendants of all documents and instruments, on file in response to order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Sunny Slope Water Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Peters v. Sacramento City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Wheat v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Adelt v. Richmond School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Save Oxnard Shores v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Beloin v. BlankenhornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Kawahara v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API