Reichert Milling Co. v. George
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
The petitioner feeling aggrieved at the conclusion of the Court of Appeals in holding that, under the facts in this case, as found by that court, the defendant, the Reichert Milling Company, was due the general affirmative charge in its behalf, has applied to this court, by proper petition, for a writ of certiorari to review and revise the opinion and judgment of the Court of Appeals.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals states:
“Appellee’s testimony tended to prove the following facts:
“ ‘That her brother purchased for her a sack of flour manufactured, sacked, and put upon the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Cruse-Crawford Mfg. Co. v. RuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Craft v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Reichert Milling Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Dr. Pepper Co. v. BrittainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.