Legal Opinion

Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 13, 1959No. 8 Div. 914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

This action is in tort for personal injuries. The complaint contained one count to which demurrers were overruled, and charged that the-defendant was negligent in the preparation of its canned goods, i. e., pork and beans, which plaintiff purchased from an intermediate dealer, and which he ate shortly thereafter and became violently ill. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $4500. The appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and it appealed.

This court has considered numerous cases touching the duty of care required of manufacturers of food…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Havard v. PALMER & BAKER ENGINEERS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. City of Mobile v. HavardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. McCardleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Calvert Fire Insurance Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API