Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The action is in tort for personal injuries. The complaint, to which demurrers were sustained, charged that defendant was a retail grocery, selling foodstuffs, including flour; that the agent or servant of defendant, acting in the line and scope of employment, negligently sold to plaintiff a sack of flour containing calcium arsenate, a poison; that plaintiff ate biscuits prepared from this flour, was poisoned and made sick.
Under the liberal rule of pleading long established with us, if a complaint in. tort discloses a duty of care in the matter complained of, a general…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Canavan v. . City of MechanicvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Bigelow v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allen v. Delchamps, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Sencer v. Carl's MarketSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- McCauley v. Manda Brothers Provisions CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Bradford v. Moore Brothers Feed and GrocerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.