Dr. Pepper Co. v. Brittain
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is an action by the consumer of a bottled drink, alleged to have been prepared for consumption by appellant engaged in the bottling of soft drinks, and selling them to the public for human consumption.
Count A, the only one submitted to the jury, alleged those facts, and that the bottled drink was purchased from the Greai Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, operating a store, and consumed by plaintiff, who sustained personal suffering and sickness due to the presence of a black substance, fly, or a substance which was unwholesome in the bottle, as the proximate result of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Try-Me Beverage Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Collins Baking Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Reichert Milling Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wallace v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Estes v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Ada Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. AsburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Florence Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Jasper Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. BreedAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.