Reichert Milling Co. v. George
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
On former certiorari in this case, 162 So. 393, it was stated in the majority opinion: “It is essentially a case where an injury has occurred under such circumstances that the law • raises a presumption of negligence, which will supply proof of actual negligence until this presumption is overcome by proof on the part of the party to whom the presumption of negligence is thus imputed. So far as the opinion of the Court of Appeals discloses to the contrary, there was no such exculpatory evidence.”
After the case was remanded to that court, 162 So. 383, the opinion of the majority…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Craft v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Rochester-Hall Drug Co. v. BowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Try-Me Beverage Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Reichert Milling Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cranford v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Life Insurance Company of Georgia v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Flannagin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Ex Parte ThaggardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Pigford v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.