Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Waldrop
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The suit was for damages for persona! injury alleged to have been received from the service to plaintiff and her partaking of food unfit for human consumption. The food was prepared by defendant and served to the patrons of its restaurant.
The evidence showed certain patrons of defendant’s restaurant, at the same time and place, had the same article of food, viz., mayonnaise, with other and different items of food, and became ill on the same day in which that food was partaken. That is to say, the one article of food partaken of by all patrons so becoming ill from food poison…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evans v. SwaimSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Garcia v. Color Tile Distributing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. HardwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. BaileyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.