Legal Opinion
Zakaessian v. Zakaessian
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 7, 1945No. Civ. 12854PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on an order sustaining the demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend.
The second amended complaint was divided into three causes of action: First, the plaintiff alleged that on or about December 15, 1921, May and H. D. Saville and Amber H. and W. J. Chase conveyed a certain described piece of property, of which they were the owners, to Karkin Zakaessian for a consideration of $7,000, which was supplied solely by plaintiff, pursuant to an agreement between Karkin and plaintiff that title was to be taken in Karkin’s name;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.