Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Muller
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1960No. Civ. 18519PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant Muller’s motion to vacate or reopen an order granting a preliminary injunction in an action to abate nuisances. We find no error.
The nuisances alleged were the maintenance on one parcel of land of an old shed, and on another of a small frame storage shed and two house trailers, in both instances in violation of specified sections of respondent’s Building Code and City Planning Code and of the State Housing Act.
On January 25, 1957, there was issued an order directing the defendants to appear on January 31 and show cause why a preliminary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Riskin v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Marino v. ValentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Muller v. ReaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Monastero v. Los Angeles Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lopez v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Big Bear Mun. Water Dist. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- San Francisco Lathing, Inc. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Josephson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.