Farrar v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WESTHUES, C.
[ 392] Appellant Farrar filed this suit to recover damages alleging that through the negligence of the defendant he contracted silicosis while he was employed as a sand blaster by the defendant at Springfield, Missouri. A jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $45,000. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for new trial assigning as a reason therefor error in an instruction given at plaintiff’s request. Plaintiff appealed.
*411The defendant in its answer pleaded the statute of limitations, that is, Title 45, Sec. 56, U. S. C. A., which provides “No action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Plazak v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Tennessee Eastman Corp. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Minyard v. Woodward Iron Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Charles Wing Young v. Clinchfield Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Cacioppo v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. HoltSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Arnold v. SpearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.