Legal Opinion

Farrar v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1950No. 41900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTHUES, C.

[ 392] Appellant Farrar filed this suit to recover damages alleging that through the negligence of the defendant he contracted silicosis while he was employed as a sand blaster by the defendant at Springfield, Missouri. A jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $45,000. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for new trial assigning as a reason therefor error in an instruction given at plaintiff’s request. Plaintiff appealed.

*411The defendant in its answer pleaded the statute of limitations, that is, Title 45, Sec. 56, U. S. C. A., which provides “No action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Plazak v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Tennessee Eastman Corp. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. Minyard v. Woodward Iron Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Charles Wing Young v. Clinchfield Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  3. Cacioppo v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. HoltSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Arnold v. SpearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API