Legal Opinion

Cacioppo v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1977No. 28034PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW JACKSON HIGGINS, Special Judge.

Appeal from verdict and judgment for plaintiff in action for actual and punitive damages for continuing trespass to real estate. The dispositive question is whether the court erred in permitting recovery for damages which arose prior to five years immediately preceding institution of the action. Reversed and remanded.

Respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal for the reasons: (1) The notice of appeal is insufficient to confer jurisdiction because it states that defendant “appeals from the judgment entered * * * on the ninth day of May, 1975”; the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sisters of St. Mary v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. De Paul Hospital School of Nursing, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Martin v. PotashnickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Baron v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dixon v. ShaftonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Weiss v. RojanasathitSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. Vogel v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Young v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API