Legal Opinion

Plazak v. Allegheny Steel Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1936No. Appeals, 209 and 230PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

Plaintiff, alleging that he suffered with an occupational disease resulting from defendant’s violation of the Act of May 2, 1905, P. L. 352, sections 11,13, 43 PS sections 5, 6, regulating employment in industrial establishments, obtained a verdict. On defendant’s motion, the court granted a new trial; from that order the plaintiff appeals. The defendant appeals from the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v.

Plaintiff declared on violation of sections 11 and 13. Section 11 required that “Exhaust fans of sufficient power, or other sufficient devices, shall be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Mauchline v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Gairt v. Curry Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. DeMartino v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API