Legal Opinion

Charles Wing Young v. Clinchfield Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1961No. 8236PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries, brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., by Charles Wing Young, a former employee of the defendant, Clinchfield Railroad Company. The plaintiff sought recovery for silicosis, attributed to the inhalation of silica in the course of his work for the defendant. Upon a jury verdict, judgment for $6,000.00 was entered in favor of the plaintiff by the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The defendant’s appeal asserts that the trial court erred in three respects:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Farrar v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Gary C. Lancaster v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Nial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  3. National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Albert E. Albertson v. T.J. Stevenson & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Lee Quinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API