Legal Opinion

Tennessee Eastman Corp. v. Newman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 20, 1938PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPok-Tkum, J.

The defendant-in-error, plaintiff below, George Newman, was an employee of the Tennessee Eastman Corporation from the year 1929 until March of the year 1935, when because of an alleged occupational disease contracted during his employment he became disabled and was compelled to quit his work, and not having recovered he instituted this suit in November 1935, seeking to hold the corporation liable for a violation of the Tennessee Workshop and Factory Inspection Act, carried into the Code under Sections 5339, 5340'. The case was removed by the defendant to the Federal Court and it went to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Albert v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Cardin v. McClellanTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ferguson v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bellamy v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Stanbury v. BacardiTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API