Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
In this action to recover $275,000.00 damages for serious injury to the plaintiff’s vision, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Dorothy Krug, and against Sterling Drug for $125,000.00 and Sterling has appealed. At the close of all the evidence the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the second defendant, Beaumont Pharmacy. Beaumont, however, filed a cross claim against Sterling for its attorneys’ fees and expense of litigation; that claim was separately tried by the court, found in favor of Sterling and Beaumont has appealed from that judgment.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Cluck v. AbeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v. Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Stith v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Lydia Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., and Winthrop LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.