Legal Opinion

Gould v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1957No. 40,336PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

This is a replevin action to recover possession of a diamond or its value. After the jury returned a general verdict for the plaintiff the court granted a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from that order and defendant cross-appeals from an order overruling his motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence.

The pleadings are not long and in such form they disclose the general facts relied on by the parties to support their respective claims. For that reason they will be quoted at length.

Omitting formal averments,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Sanders v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Bishop v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Angell v. HesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. James v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Barajas v. SondersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Denman v. Aspen Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API