Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. Latham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1956No. 40,000PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This was an action in replevin to recover possession of an automobile. The trial was had by a jury, which found for defendants. This appeal is from an order granting plaintiff a new trial and setting aside an answer to a special question.

The pleadings may be summarized as follows: The petition alleged that defendants (appellants) Marshall H. Latham and Bernice E. Latham are husband and wife; that they executed and delivered to plaintiff (appellee) the promissory note and chattel mortgage in question; that the chattel mortgage was duly…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Kniffen v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Bishop v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Ferguson v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Schmid v. EslickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Dryden v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Jenkins v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Blackburn v. ColvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API