Nicholas v. Latham
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
This was an action in replevin to recover possession of an automobile. The trial was had by a jury, which found for defendants. This appeal is from an order granting plaintiff a new trial and setting aside an answer to a special question.
The pleadings may be summarized as follows: The petition alleged that defendants (appellants) Marshall H. Latham and Bernice E. Latham are husband and wife; that they executed and delivered to plaintiff (appellee) the promissory note and chattel mortgage in question; that the chattel mortgage was duly…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Kniffen v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Bishop v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Ferguson v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Schmid v. EslickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Dryden v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Jenkins v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Blackburn v. ColvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.