James v. City of Pittsburg
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fontron, J.:
This is an action questioning the validity of an ordinance of the City of Pittsburg, Kansas, purporting to annex certain land to the city. The plaintiffs are the individual owners of a majority of the tracts or parcels of land lying within the area sought to be annexed. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the defendants, who are the City of Pittsburg and its commissioners, and the plaintiffs have perfected this appeal from that judgment. For convenience, the appellants will be designated as plain tiffs throughout this opinion, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Garden City v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Giltner v. StephensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Gould v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Vaughn v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Wiggins v. Housing Authority of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.