Legal Opinion

Angell v. Hester

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1960No. 41,592PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision on a state highway. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, after which the trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Appeal has been taken by the defendant from this order.

The only question presented is whether the trial court erred in ordering a new trial.

The established rule in this jurisdiction is that if a-trial court is dissatisfied with a verdict it not only has the authority but it is its duty to set…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Nicholas v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Ehrsam v. BorgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. King v. Vets Cab, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Taylor v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kirkendoll v. NeustromCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  2. Lafferty v. WattleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Jim Worden v. Tri-State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Jarboe v. PineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  5. Southard v. LiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API