Legal Opinion
State v. Person
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1993No. CC 89102773; CA A67862; SC S39464PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*587GILLETTE, J.
In this criminal case, defendant moved to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that the state had failed to bring him to trial within 90 days of receipt of his speedy trial notice, as required by ORS 135.763(1), set out infra. The trial court denied the motion, finding that the continuance of the trial beyond the 90-day period had been “reasonable and fair.” The Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that neither defendant nor the state had requested a continuance. State v. Person, 113 Or App 40, 831 P2d 700 (1992). We allowed review and now affirm the decision of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TrenaryOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Oregon Business Planning Council v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Emerald PUD v. PP & LOregon Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. Bruce Lincoln ButterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Danielson v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.