Legal Opinion
Emerald PUD v. PP & L
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1986No. TC 83-1726 CA A30473 SC S32566PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
729 P.2d 552 (1986)
302 Or. 256
EMERALD PEOPLE'S UTILITY DISTRICT, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, Petitioner On Review,
v.
PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT CO., an Oregon Corporation, Respondent On Review.
TC 83-1726; CA A30473; SC S32566.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted September 4, 1986.
Decided November 25, 1986.
John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Donald A. Haagensen, James M. Finn, and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.
Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oregon Business Planning Council v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Eckles v. WoolleyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Little Nestucca Road Co. v. Tillamook CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Emerald People's Utility District v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- GTE Northwest Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- L. H. Morris Electric, Inc. v. Hyundai Semiconductor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos County Airport DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.