State v. Trenary
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
Persons stopped on suspicion of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) often are requested by police officers to perform “field sobriety tests.” ORS 813.135 states that, “[bjefore the tests are administered, the person requested to take the tests shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests.” In this case, the arresting officer asked defendant to perform field sobriety tests but failed to inform defendant of the consequences of refusing. Defendant nonetheless performed the tests. Following the denial of his motion to suppress the test…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RobertiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MazzolaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. KitzmanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.