Legal Opinion

State v. Benner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 24, 2012No. 101040; A145265PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

In this criminal case, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment against him on the ground that the state failed to bring him to trial within 90 days of receipt of his request for a speedy trial, as required by ORS 135.760 to 135.765, set out below. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that defendant had waived his right to a speedy trial by failing to object to his scheduled trial date, which was outside of the 90-day period, when the date was mentioned at two pretrial hearings.

Thereafter, defendant tried his case to the court and was convicted. He appeals, assigning error to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. ChadwickOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Jensen v. MedleyOregon Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. StorkusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API