Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2569 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

The City of Pittsburgh and Mayor Bichard S. Caliguiri (Petitioners) have appealed from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) adopted September 28, 1978. The order granted an $81 million rate increase to Duquesne Light Company *179(Duquesne) and denied the Petitioners a refund from a $60 million tariff which Duquesne was permitted to file effective during and subject to the investigation of a proposed $127,9 million rate increase. The Petitioners appeal only the denial of the refund.

This case originated on October 1, 1976 when Duquesne filed Tariff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holt v. YonceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Baker v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Pennsylvania Retailers' Associations v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API