Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1948No. Appeal, 177PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

On February 19, 1948, the Philadelphia Transportation Company, intervening appellee, filed new tariffs with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission initiating increased bus and rail fares. In general, the new tariff provided that the 10 cent cash or 8% cent token fare on rail, motorized rail and trackless trolley lines be increased to a 10 cent straight cash fare; that the 10 cent cash fare on certain bus lines be increased to 12% cent ticket or token or 13 cent cash fare; that the 10 cent transfer involving interchange be increased to 12% cent token exchange .or 13…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1935
  2. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Baldwin AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Carpenter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. M. C. Kiser Co. v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API