Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Holt v. Yonce

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 18, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-910PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

This is an action challenging the constitutionality of certain statutes under which the defendant South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, hereinafter designated as S.C.E. & G., has put into effect a temporary rate increase for its electric and gas services. The procedure for implementing such temporary increase for public utilities selling electricity is codified in Sections 24-31 et seq., of the 1962 Code of Laws of South Carolina; the procedure for establishing such temporary increase for public utilities selling gas is codified in Sections 58-111 et seq., of the 1962 Code…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mississippi Power Co. v. GoudyMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sellers v. Iowa Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Georgia Power Project v. Georgia Power CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API