Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Joseph Horne Co., a ratepayer of Duquesne Light Co., appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, which granted Duquesne, a regulated utility, a rate increase of $64 million. We must determine whether the option order procedure, which the PUC employed here, violates either the Pennsylvania Public Utility Code, 66 Pa. C. S. §§101-3315, or the due process clause of the United States or Pennsylvania Constitution.
The utility originally filed Tariff Supplement No. 49 with the PUC, requesting a general rate increase in excess of $100 million. The PUC…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Baker v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Pennsylvania Retailers' Associations v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984