Legal Opinion

Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1132 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Joseph Horne Co., a ratepayer of Duquesne Light Co., appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, which granted Duquesne, a regulated utility, a rate increase of $64 million. We must determine whether the option order procedure, which the PUC employed here, violates either the Pennsylvania Public Utility Code, 66 Pa. C. S. §§101-3315, or the due process clause of the United States or Pennsylvania Constitution.

The utility originally filed Tariff Supplement No. 49 with the PUC, requesting a general rate increase in excess of $100 million. The PUC…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Baker v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Pennsylvania Retailers' Associations v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API