Legal Opinion

Baker v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1191 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

On July 14, 1972, Philadelphia Electric Company, intervening appellee, filed Supplements Nos. 5, 6 and 7 to its several electric tariffs. Supplement No. 5 provided an increase of about 3% over existing rates, Supplement No. 6 an increase of 6% over existing rates, and Supplement No. 7 an increase of 9% over existing rates. The proposed effective date of the increases was September 12, 1972, which was later voluntarily postponed to October 4, 1972.

In an order dated October 3, 1972, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ordered the suspension of Supplement Nos. 6 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Holt v. YonceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  4. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Pennsylvania Retailers' Associations v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Knight v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API