Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
These three consolidated actions involve the central issue of whether Section 1307 of the. Public Utility Code,1 the energy cost rate (ECR) adjustment provision, is unconstitutional on the ground that it fails to afford procedural due process.
*403Allegheny Lndlnm S.teel Corporation (Allegheny Ludlnm) initiated these proceeding’s, addressing, onr *404original jurisdiction by filing a petition for review in the nature of a complaint for a declaratory judgment *405that Section 1307 is unconstitutional.2 The Public Utility Commission (PUC) is a respondent and West Penn Power Company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Conestoga National Bank v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Parker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Ruszin v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- MCT Transportation Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Spooner v. Secretary of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.