Legal Opinion

Otto v. Union National Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1951No. L. A. 21377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

By this action, Helen Otto seeks to terminate an inter vivos trust created by her. The appeal is from a judgment which followed an order sustaining general demurrers to her complaint which she failed to amend.

In 1941, Helen Otto, then Helen Wheeler, created an inter vivos trust with a corpus consisting of assets in excess of $500,000, which was her separate property. The trust indenture includes a spendthrift provision in favor of the trustor and requires the payment of the income to her for life. Paragraph IV of the declaration of trust provides that upon the death of the trustor, the trust…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Estate of TroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Sears v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. GrableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Levy v. Crocker-Citizens National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. First & C Corp. v. WenckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Otto v. Union National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API