Legal Opinion

Sears v. Putnam

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 15, 1869PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The plaintiff, who is administrator, with the will annexed, of Richard Orease, brings this bill in equity to obtain the direction and instruction of the court as to the construction and effect of the will. The ninth article of the will is as follows :

*6“ All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, of every name or nature, I give in equal parts to and amongst my nephews and nieces, (the children of my sisters, Eliza F. Sears and Sarah M. Laughton, both deceased,) the portion coming to my nieces to be held in trust for them, during the term of twenty-five years from the day of my death, by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. EwingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  2. Loring v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gray v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Anderson v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Winsor v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Holmes v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API