Legal Opinion

Estate of Phelps

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1920No. S. F. No. 9177. S. F. No. 9210PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The fifth clause of the will of the testatrix devised the residue of her property, consisting wholly of real estate and embracing nearly the entire estate, to the executors as trustees in trust for certain purposes specified therein. Upon a former appeal in the matter of this estate this court held that the devise in trust was to be performed by the executors in their capacity as trustees and not in the course of their administration of the estate as executors.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robert v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Van Vechten v. Van VeghtenNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  3. Sacramento Bank v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In Re Estate of PichoirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Nellis v. RickardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API