Legal Opinion

Otto v. Union National Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1951No. L. A. 21377Published

1Opinion of the Court

38 Cal.2d 233 (1951)

238 P.2d 961

HELEN E. OTTO, Appellant,

v.

UNION NATIONAL BANK OF PASADENA et al., Respondents.

Docket No. L.A. 21377.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 21, 1951.

George Penney, Dunlap, Holmes, Ross & Woodson and Robert H. Dunlap for Appellant.

Hahn & Hahn, Delbridge, Hamblin & Linton, Leon W. Delbridge and Donald W. Hamblin for Respondents.

EDMONDS, J.

By this action, Helen Otto seeks to terminate an inter vivos trust created by her. The appeal is from a judgment which followed an order sustaining general demurrers to her complaint which she failed to amend.

In 1941,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Eakle v. IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API