Legal Opinion

Derong v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Charles Derong, Jr., was fatally injured on January 27, 1931, while pursuing his employment. Plaintiff, as the surviving parent, claims the death benefit provided for by sec. 102.09 (4a), Stats. 1929, which so far as here material provides:

“(4a) If the deceased employee leaves no one wholly dependent upon him for support, partial dependency and death benefits therefor shall be as follows:
“(a) An unestranged surviving parent or parents, residing within any of the states or District of Columbia of the *90United States, shall receive a death benefit of twelve hundred dollars.”

The death benefit was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Michel v. McKennaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hayes v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. MacKenzie v. KutzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shawley v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Simmons Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Burt Bros. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Zweig v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Golden Harvest Dairy Co. v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API