Legal Opinion

Zweig v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

A controversy over compensation for injuries sustained by Robert Henderson in the course of his employment arises because the appellants question the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission in acting as it did in modifying the order dated October 11, 1948. On June 17, 1952, Flenderson was awarded additional compensation based on a finding of 40 per cent of permanent bodily disability.

The circuit court ruled that the commission, under circumstances to be referred to, acted within its jurisdiction in entering the order of modification; that there was evidence to sustain the finding that as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Beck v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Schutt v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Wisconsin Axle Division v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Speelmon Elevated Tank Service v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Witek v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. KeehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API