Legal Opinion

Burt Bros. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

On this appeal appellants complain that the finding by the examiner that Mrs. Cather and Ross Bauman were the unestranged parents of Orville Bauman is not supported by credible evidence if the common meaning of the word “unestranged” is used. Whether a child and his parents are unestranged is a question of fact to be determined upon substantial evidence by the Industrial Commission. Derong v. Industrial Comm. 209 Wis. 88, 244 N. W. 591. In reviewing a finding of fact of the Industrial Commission the function of this court is to determine whether that finding is supported by credible evidence.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. R. Meyer & Sons Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gerue v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Jasperson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Derong v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Borden Company v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Northwestern Asbestos & Cork Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. NORTHWESTERN A. & C. CO. v. Industrial Comm.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API