Legal Opinion

Simmons Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowleR, J.

The plaintiff claims the award was erroneous because the evidence before the commission establishes that (1) the employee’s injuries were self-inflicted — in other *448words, the employee committed suicide; because (2) the employee was not “performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment” when at the elevator shaft down which he fell; and that (3) if an award was proper it should have been reduced fifteen per cent, under sec. 102.58, Stats.(1) The statute imposing the conditions of liability for workmen’s compensation provides that compensation shall not be allowed “where the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fehrer v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Racine County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Milwaukee Corrugating Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Tewes v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Suffolk Peanut Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  2. Barber v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Zschock v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dept. of Transp. v. Transp. Comm.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Karlslyst v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API