MacKenzie v. Kutz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
Appellants’ brief contains no assignment of errors, but we gather that the points intended to be raised are as follows : (1) The fund and personal property involved belonged to the appealing defendants in common because (a) it was derived from the personalty left by their deceased father (b) or acquired by the bankrupt for the appellants pursuant to agreement with funds advanced by the sisters or (c) was purchased pursuant to agreement for appellants with a part of the proceeds of a mortgage of the farm left by the father in which the bankrupt and appellants joined. (2) The evidence does not…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Derong v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Krause v. KrauseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942