Legal Opinion

Michel v. McKenna

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1929PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, J.(1) The record presents what the trial judge aptly characterizes as “an ordinary automobile collision case,” which involves pure questions of fact for the jury, upon a record that would sustain a finding either way upon the question of which of these drivers was negligent. Were the question whether the evidence sustains the verdict the only one presented by the case, the judgment would be affirmed without f.urther discussion. But the case presents other questions that demand consideration.(2) The first question arises because plaintiff’s attorney, Irving T. Touhey, appeared as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In re BooneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
  3. Strong v. International Building Loan & Invest. UnionIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. United States v. CostenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1889
  5. Peirce v. PalmerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  2. Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Brasseaux v. GirouardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Farmers MA Ins. Co. v. Milwaukee A. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API