Legal Opinion

Collins v. . Wooten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

A judge of the Superior Court, when not bolding tbe courts of the district of bis residence by assignment under tbe statute, or by exchange, or under a special commission from tbe Governor, has jurisdiction in matters pending in bis borne district only when such jurisdiction is expressly conferred by statute. No jurisdiction is conferred upon tbe resident judge by the requirement of tbe Constitution that every judge of tbe Superior Court shall reside in tbe district for which be is elected. Ward v. Agrillo, 194 N. C., 321; Howard v. Coach Co., 211 N. C., 329.

Tbe approval by tbe resident judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Wellons v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Dail v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Ward v. . AgrilloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API