Legal Opinion

Wellons v. . Lassiter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1931PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabKSON, J.

Tbe plaintiff in apt time before tbe clerk made a motion to strike out defendants’ answer for tbe reason tbat it was sbam and frivolous under C. S., 510, wbicb is as follows: “Sbam and irrelevant answers and defenses may be stricken out on motion, upon sucb terms as tbe court may in its discretion impose.” Tbis motion was denied by tbe clerk and tbe plaintiff excepted and appealed to tbe Superior Court. Tbe cause being on appeal in tbe Superior Court, tbe court below bad tbe power and authority to bear tbe matter. C. S., 536. Washington v. Hodges, ante, at p. 370.

Tbe court below struck out…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Duffer v. . BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Glisson v. . GlissonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Sutherland v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Mills v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Neighbors v. NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API