Legal Opinion

Dail v. . Hawkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStact, C. J.

Conceding, without deciding, that the order of abatement rendered at the January Term may have been erroneous, and therefore correctable by appeal, Moore v. Packer, 174 N. C., 665, 94 S. E., 449, still it is not perceived wherein it was irregularly entered. Fowler v. Fowler, 190 N. C., 536, 130 S. E., 315; Roberts v. Allman, 106 N. C., 391, 11 S. E., 424. An irregular judgment is one entered contrary to the course and practice of the court, Harrell v. Welstead, 206 N. C., 817, 175 S. E., 283; Finger v. Smith, 191 N. C., 818, 133 S. E., 186; Duffer v. Brunson, 188 N. C., 789, 125 S. E., 619;…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Cameron v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Neighbors v. NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Cayton v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API