Legal Opinion

McHugh v. Rosaia

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1935No. 25724. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

April 10, 1928, plaintiff, as vendor, entered into a contract for the sale of certain real estate to one Harris, as vendee. On April 19, 1928, Harris assigned the contract to the defendant Rosaia. Under the contract, there were principal payments of two thousand dollars each, due one, two, three and four years from date. Interest was payable semi-annually.

Rosaia made the payments due in 1929 and 1930. He failed to make the payment due April 14, 1931. On July 8, 1931, he executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note, payable in ninety days, in the amount of $2,527. This amount included…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. First Bank of Cordova v. TjosevigWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Snohomish River Boom Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Post-Intelligencer Publishing Co. v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Geest v. WillardWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. StotskyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Union Central Life Inurance v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Howell v. BentonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Trans West Co. v. TeuscherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API