Norman v. Meeker
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered September 1, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The one question here to determine is whether the note of appellant sued on was given by him and accepted by respondent in lieu of cash, as payment and satisfaction pro tanto of part of the purchase price under a conditional sale of chattels. It is here a mixed question of law and fact.
On March 24, 1915, respondent sold to one Gregg, for a consideration of $1,000, a confectionery and pool-room business. A conditional sale contract was entered into which stipulated that of the agreed purchase price, “second party *535(vendee) has paid a note for five hundred ($500) dollars for 60 days, the receipt…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Stewart & Holmes Drug Co. v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Manson v. DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Minneapolis Harvester Works v. HallySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Alden v. Dyer & BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Smith v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Bank of California v. Clear Lake Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. JaussaudWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Kimble Motor Car Co. v. AndrowWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Van Geest v. WillardWashington Supreme Court · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.