Legal Opinion
Blenz v. Fogle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1923No. 17787PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, Blenz, commenced this action in the superior court for Stevens county, seeking recovery of a judgment against the defendant, Fogle, for an alleged balance of $5,450 and interest, due upon a $6,000 promissory note, executed and delivered by Fogle to him, and also seeking foreclosure of two chattel mortgages purporting to secure the same, executed and delivered by Fogle to him upon farm implements, live stock, and crops situated in that county. The principal defense made in behalf of Fogle is that the consideration for the note in question has failed, in so far *225as the note…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Cranston v. West Coast Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Warren v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Moon Bros. Carriage Co. v. DevenishWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Globe Express Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Davies v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Cook v. VennigerholzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Aeronautical Industrial Dist. Lodge No. 751District Court, W.D. Washington · 1950
- Edwards v. MuriMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Van Geest v. WillardWashington Supreme Court · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.