Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Stotsky

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1938No. 26813. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought to recover a deficiency remaining due on a note after the sale of certain real property situated in California pursuant to a power of sale contained in a deed of trust. Judgment was entered for respondent upon a directed verdict in its favor, and thereupon appellant appealed.

The facts necessary to present the issues raised are these: On or about December 22, 1927, appellant executed and delivered to The First National Bank of San Pedro, California, a certain promissory note in the sum of $11,500, payable to this bank, with interest until paid at seven per cent per…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. American Surety Co. v. Philippine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Hogan v. HorsfallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Easterly v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. First National Bank v. Charles ConwayWashington Supreme Court · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Payette Lakes Protective Ass'n v. Lake Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sweeny v. Sweeny Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Howell v. BentonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Rawsthorn v. RawsthornWashington Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API