Legal Opinion

Van Geest v. Willard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1947No. 30004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This is an action on a promissory note, instituted by C. Van Geest, as the owner and holder of such note, against Howard Willard and Faye Willard, his wife, makers of the note. The note, introduced as plaintiff’s exhibit No. 1, is dated July 18, 1944, and is for the principal sum of five hundred dollars. It is made payable to the order of R. W. Privette and became due February 1, 1945. The note draws interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from date. It is signed by Mr. Howard Willard and Mrs. Howard Willard and is endorsed on the back, “Pay to the order of C. Van Geest. R. W.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Jones-Short Motor Co. v. BolinWashington Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Good Hope Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Department of Social & Health Services v. State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Fowles v. SweeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Department of Agriculture v. State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Geyen v. Time Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API