Weeks v. Garibaldi South Gold Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— This is an action to recover a certain sum of money alleged to be due for work and labor done and performed at the defendants' request, in and about certain mining property.
The Garibaldi Mining Company is a foreign corporation, having no managing or business agent, cashier, or secretary resident in the state of California. An effort was made to serve the defendants Spruance and Rodgers by publication of summons under section 412 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It appears, however, that no affidavit of the printer, his foreman, or principal clerk, that such publication took place,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mulcahy v. GlazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- de McKinlay v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Mahoney v. MiddletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Reynolds v. BrumagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Smith v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Savings & Loan Society v. McKoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Finance Co. v. . HendrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Meeks v. Oklahoma Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Brown v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.