Reynolds v. Brumagim
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, in the Fourth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Morrison, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 2, Myrick, J.:
T. B. McManus died intestate, January 15th, 1861. On the 8th of August, 1864, defendant Brumagim was appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased, and received letters. August 26th, 1866, Brumagim returned and' filed an inventory and appraisement of the estate of intestate, which set out a tract of land by metes and bounds, valued at $1,000, and, referring to the tract, contained the following words : “ The above land is held by parties in possession, claiming to hold the same adversely to the estate.”
May 1st, 1867, Isabella McManus, sister and heir of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Estate of StottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Graff v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Clark v. CallaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rafferty v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Barreiro v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Tobelman v. HildebrandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Varnes v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Washington v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.